Abandoned Farmland in Britain: Scrub, Bracken and Wildlife

Farmland abandonment means land that was once farmed is no longer managed for agriculture. In Britain it is most often seen on marginal ground: steep slopes, wet fields, rough upland pastures and small, awkward plots that are hard to farm profitably. It is a slow process, usually measured in years, and it rarely happens everywhere at once. The effects depend on the place. Some wildlife benefits, other species lose open habitats, and rural communities feel the change in other ways.

What “abandonment” really means

The term can mislead. Land is seldom left entirely untouched. A field might lose its livestock but still be mown once a year, or be owned by someone who lives elsewhere and does little with it. Researchers sometimes prefer terms such as “land-use change” or “reduced management”, and different studies count different things, so figures from one source should not be compared directly with another.

There is also a difference between land that stops being farmed and land that is deliberately taken out of production for conservation, woodland planting or other uses. The first is a drift; the second is a choice.

Why it happens

No single cause explains it. Factors often cited include:

Which landscapes are affected

Uplands and moorland edges

Hill farms in places such as Dartmoor, Exmoor and the Pennines depend on grazing to keep land open. Where grazing falls, bracken, gorse and scrub tend to spread. Historic field walls and farm tracks can become hidden.

Small enclosed fields

Fields enclosed by Devon-style hedge banks or stone walls are expensive to maintain. If they are not grazed or cut, they can become overgrown, and hedges may become lines of unmanaged trees.

Effects on wildlife

Ecologists describe a mixed picture.

Effects on people and places

When a farm stops, so does a share of local activity: contractors, feed suppliers, auctions and farm shops all depend on active holdings. Footpaths and views change as fields grow over. There can also be practical concerns, such as the build-up of dry vegetation that raises fire risk in dry spells on moorland margins.

Cultural heritage can be affected too. Field patterns, barns and walls are part of a working landscape, and they deteriorate faster once they lose their use.

Responses and debate

Policy responses include agri-environment schemes that pay for grazing, hedge laying and habitat management, support for tenants and new entrants, and encouragement for local food. There is also a lively debate about “rewilding” and natural regeneration, in which land is allowed to develop with little human control. Supporters point to potential gains for biodiversity and carbon storage; critics raise concerns about food production, rural jobs and the loss of open habitats. Evidence is still developing, and views differ.

Organic and low-input farming is one part of that conversation, because it can make marginal land viable in some cases. An opinion essay on land abandonment republished on this site shows how the issue was discussed in the early 2000s, and the welcome page describes the farming background from which this site’s topics grew.

Frequently asked questions

Is farmland abandonment common in Britain?

It occurs, mostly on marginal land. Estimates vary a great deal with how it is defined, so treat any single figure with caution.

Does abandoned land always become forest?

No. It depends on climate, soil, grazing by wild animals and nearby seed sources. Some areas turn to scrub or bracken and stay that way for decades.

Is it bad for wildlife?

Not always. Open-habitat species can lose out, while others gain. Outcomes depend on the site.

Who decides how land is managed?

The landowner or tenant decides, within planning rules, environmental regulations and the terms of any support scheme.